What are the top obstacles preventing enterprises from moving crypto pilots into production?

The biggest blockers are compliance complexity, auditability, and custody risk. MiCA licensing in Europe raises governance and safeguarding requirements, while U.S. and Asia regulators emphasize sanctions screening and Travel Rule implementation. CFOs want clear accounting policies, subledger integration, and third‑party attestations. CISOs require policy‑based approvals, HSM-backed key protection, and disaster‑recovery drills. Together, these factors extend deployment timelines and push buyers toward a small set of SOC 2‑audited providers with mature AML tooling and ERP connectors.

How are enterprises addressing AML and sanctions obligations for on‑chain transactions?

Enterprises integrate blockchain analytics and case management tools from vendors like Chainalysis, TRM Labs, and Elliptic to risk‑score counterparties and document investigations. They implement Travel Rule messaging through VASP networks and bank‑partner playbooks, with continuous screening against sanctions lists. Compliance teams use audit trails and exception workflows to satisfy regulators and internal audit. Coordination with stablecoin issuers and custodians helps standardize incident response and escalation procedures across jurisdictions.

What accounting practices are CFOs adopting to manage digital asset exposure?

Finance teams are formalizing fair value measurements, impairment testing, and disclosure policies aligned with Big Four guidance. They deploy crypto subledgers that reconcile on‑chain events with ERP systems and adopt proof‑of‑reserves or segregation attestations from custodians. Many corporates limit exposure to liquid, attestable assets and rely on SOC 2‑audited service providers. Clear revenue recognition for tokenization or settlement services and robust close processes are prerequisites before expanding production usage.

Which infrastructure choices reduce operational risk for enterprise crypto rollouts?

Risk-conscious programs favor enterprise custody with policy engines, hardware‑backed key protection, and granular allow‑listing. They select networks that support predictable finality and consider permissioned or hybrid models for sensitive workflows. Cloud deployments employ confidential computing, strict IAM, and immutable audit logs. Integration middleware and standardized APIs reduce custom code, while analytics and monitoring tools provide observability and forensics coverage across wallets, oracles, and bridges.

Where are enterprises finding near‑term ROI with blockchain and tokenization?

Early wins come from narrow, measurable use cases: treasury operations using regulated stablecoins for faster settlement, collateral mobility in capital markets, and tokenized cash sweeps with pre‑approved counterparties. These projects emphasize compliance evidence, operational SLAs, and interoperability with bank rails. Success metrics include reduced reconciliation effort, shortened settlement cycles, and improved liquidity utilization. Firms extend scope only after audit readiness and regulator engagement are demonstrably in place.

CIOs Hit Pause On Crypto Rollouts As Compliance, Accounting And Custody Snags Mount

In the past six weeks, a wave of policy updates, accounting clarifications, and vendor changes has exposed how hard it still is for large enterprises to put crypto into production. From MiCA licensing in the EU to audit-ready custody in the U.S., CFOs and CISOs are demanding stricter controls, clearer revenue recognition, and provable sanctions screening before signing multi‑year deals.

Published: December 20, 2025 By Aisha Mohammed Category: Crypto

CIOs Hit Pause On Crypto Rollouts As Compliance, Accounting And Custody Snags Mount

Executive Summary

Enterprises face rising compliance friction as EU MiCA licensing and global AML expectations tighten, extending deployment timelines and budgets for crypto initiatives (ESMA MiCA overview).
Accounting treatment and auditability of digital assets remain gating factors for CFOs, with Big Four guidance emphasizing fair value measurement, impairment, and proof-of-reserves controls (PwC crypto accounting guidance).
Operational security and key management are top risks, pushing buyers toward enterprise custody and policy engines from vendors like Fireblocks and banks including BNY Mellon (BIS analysis on custody and risk).
Real‑world asset tokenization pilots continue, but production deals hinge on AML screening, data residency, and chain selection, with institutions evaluating stacks from JPMorgan Onyx, Circle, and Consensys (BIS Project initiatives).

Regulatory Tightening Meets Enterprise Risk Committees

CIOs and compliance leaders say the hardest part of production crypto deployments now lies in synchronizing licensing, AML, and market abuse controls across regions, a challenge sharpened by Europe’s MiCA regime and ongoing guidance from banking supervisors. European regulators require crypto‑asset service providers to meet detailed governance, conflict‑of‑interest, and safeguarding rules before servicing institutional clients, raising legal and operational costs relative to pilots (ESMA MiCA overview). Asia’s leading hubs, including Singapore and Hong Kong, continue to expect robust source‑of‑funds checks and sanctions watchlist controls, further complicating multi‑market rollout plans (MAS digital payment token guide; HKMA virtual assets resources).

Banks and payment providers integrating on‑chain settlement say Travel Rule compliance and screening for sanctioned addresses remain non‑negotiable. That has elevated the role of blockchain analytics suites from Chainalysis, TRM Labs, and Elliptic...

Read the full article at AI BUSINESS 2.0 NEWS