Which benchmarks matter most when comparing Ethereum L2s and Solana?

Focus on sustained throughput under load, p95 latency, time-to-inclusion versus time-to-finality, and a clear breakdown of fees into execution gas, data availability, and proof costs. Public resources like L2Beat detail gas-normalized activity for L2s, while Solana documentation highlights latency and validator performance telemetry. Together, these reveal real user experience, not just peak numbers. Ask for reproducible runs, workload definitions, and configuration details from networks and operators.

How should zero-knowledge rollup proving costs be evaluated?

ZK rollup benchmarks should include prover runtime on specified hardware, memory footprint, and proof submission intervals, plus how they affect batch sizing and finality. Teams such as Polygon Labs and StarkWare have outlined proving considerations in technical posts that translate into end-user fees. Use these disclosures to compare cost-per-proof and sensitivity to hardware upgrades. Consistent reporting makes it possible to project total cost of ownership across different ZK stacks.

What data availability metrics should buyers request from providers?

Ask for explicit cost-per-megabyte, sampling assumptions, and how data is priced during congestion or upgrades. Providers like Celestia outline DA considerations in blog posts, and Ethereum.org provides guidance on DA trade-offs for rollups. Combine DA costs with execution and proof expenses to estimate end-to-end fees per transaction. Ensure metrics include both typical and worst-case scenarios to capture operational risk.

How can enterprises validate network claims before deployment?

Use open-source benchmarking suites such as Hyperledger Caliper for reproducible tests, and cross-check results against public dashboards like L2Beat or operator telemetry. Request configuration files, workload definitions, and test harness code. Pilot on realistic workloads that mirror expected user behavior, and measure p95 latency and failure recovery. Include third-party observers or auditors where possible to avoid bias in reported performance numbers.

What trends will shape crypto performance comparisons in 2026?

Expect more standardized reporting across networks, broader client diversity to reduce tail latency, and clearer disclosures on data availability and proving costs. Rollups will emphasize blob usage efficiency and finality windows, while Solana and other high-throughput L1s highlight improvements from network stack optimizations. Greater alignment on definitions will aid procurement, with independent dashboards and open benchmarks serving as the de facto source of truth for buyers.

Ethereum Foundation Updates L2 Benchmarks as Solana Reports Latency Improvements

Crypto infrastructure teams move to standardized, comparable performance metrics across throughput, latency, finality, and data availability costs. Ethereum scaling dashboards and Solana node telemetry anchor new cross-chain comparisons aimed at enterprise buyers and developers.

Published: January 10, 2026 By Dr. Emily Watson Category: Crypto

Ethereum Foundation Updates L2 Benchmarks as Solana Reports Latency Improvements

...

Read the full article at AI BUSINESS 2.0 NEWS