Cross-Vendor Flight Systems Go Live as Airbus, Boeing, Thales Showcase Plug-and-Play at Dubai Airshow
Aerospace OEMs and system suppliers moved interoperability from slideware to show floor this month. Live demos at Dubai Airshow and new open-standard alignments in space communications and air traffic data signal a step-change for cross-vendor integration.
Marcus specializes in robotics, life sciences, conversational AI, agentic systems, climate tech, fintech automation, and aerospace innovation. Expert in AI systems and automation
Interoperability Takes the Main Stage at Dubai Airshow
On November 18–21, 2025, live demonstrations at the Dubai Airshow moved aerospace interoperability from theory to practice, with Airbus, Boeing, and Thales showcasing plug-and-play avionics integrations across mixed fleets. Using open architectures like the Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE) and standardized cockpit interfaces, OEMs and suppliers coordinated cross-vendor avionics components to run on shared platforms without bespoke rewrites, a milestone for lifecycle cost reduction and faster upgrades.
In booth demonstrations and technical briefings, avionics suppliers including Collins Aerospace and Honeywell Aerospace highlighted real-time compatibility between display systems and flight management applications via common data models and APIs. For more on related gaming developments. The emphasis: get certified software modules to run across different hardware stacks with minimal integration friction, aligning with the Open Group’s FACE standard, as detailed by the consortium’s technical resources here and broader avionics interface work like ARINC 661—context from SAE’s standards overview.
Space Networks Align on CCSDS and Lunar Interop
In parallel, space communications teams this month advanced alignment around CCSDS protocols to enable multi-agency interoperability for lunar and deep-space links. Agency briefings referenced the ongoing LunaNet architecture and CCSDS profiles—see background from NASA on LunaNet and the CCSDS standards catalog—focusing on standardized delay-tolerant networking and cross-network service discovery so missions can roam across partner infrastructure.
Industry system integrators, including Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, said the latest tests reduce bespoke mission interface work by pushing common service layers for telemetry, tracking, and command into reference designs. This aligns with recent technical guidance on DTN/BPsec adoption—see overview from the IETF DTN community—and complements commercial LEO constellation efforts where cross-operator handoffs are being scoped for resilience. For more on related Aerospace developments.
Air Traffic Data: SWIM, OGC APIs, and UTM Integration
Interoperability advances also surfaced in air traffic data and UTM-ATM integration over the last two weeks, with European and global stakeholders highlighting System Wide Information Management (SWIM) and aviation-specific web APIs. For more on related ai chips developments. EUROCONTROL briefings reiterated SWIM’s role in harmonizing aeronautical information, weather, and flow management—reference material is available from EUROCONTROL’s SWIM. In tandem, the Open Geospatial Consortium continued its aviation work with modern API specifications—see the OGC Aviation DWG overview.
UTM vendors discussed interoperability mechanisms to exchange intent and airspace constraints between unmanned and conventional flight operations using standards-aligned data services. This builds on broader Aerospace trends where cloud-native, versioned APIs replace format conversions and proprietary gateways, enabling cross-border data exchange and more modular certification approaches—context from FAA NextGen on digital information services.
MOSA Momentum: Certifications and Procurement Signals
Defense programs signaled accelerating adoption of Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA), with program offices emphasizing interface-based procurement and conformance certification paths that shorten integration cycles. The Open Group’s FACE conformance ecosystem—see the certification registry and methodology here—continues to anchor avionics module portability and supplier competition, allowing primes and tier-1s to bid interoperable components rather than closed stacks.
Suppliers noted that MOSA-aligned contracts now increasingly specify data rights and standardized interfaces up front, reducing downstream vendor lock and enabling incremental capability drops. For more on related automotive developments. Analysts tracking open-architecture adoption in aerospace point to improved upgrade cadence and lower integration risk when systems share consistent transport, messaging, and security profiles—additional technical background from NATO STO on open architectures.
What’s Next: From Demos to Fleet-Wide Rollouts
With demonstrations fresh from the show floor and agency briefings this month, the near-term focus shifts to certification artifacts, test vectors, and cross-vendor reference implementations that can be issued to operators. OEMs said they are targeting incremental deployments in mixed fleets—starting with non-safety-critical functions—before expanding to flight-critical domains once certification packages are complete and regulators sign off on change management.
Commercial and defense buyers are watching for proof that open-interface modules deliver measurable integration savings without compromising safety or security. Expect 2026 contracts to embed interoperability KPIs and interface conformance clauses, creating tangible business incentives to keep systems modular and vendor-agnostic while maintaining rigorous assurance—overview on assurance frameworks from EASA’s innovation hub.
About the Author
Marcus Rodriguez
Robotics & AI Systems Editor
Marcus specializes in robotics, life sciences, conversational AI, agentic systems, climate tech, fintech automation, and aerospace innovation. Expert in AI systems and automation
Frequently Asked Questions
What changed at Dubai Airshow regarding aerospace interoperability?
OEMs and avionics suppliers moved from slide presentations to live plug-and-play demos showing modules running across different vendor platforms using open standards. This proved that FACE- and ARINC-aligned components can interoperate on shared hardware and software stacks without bespoke integrations.
How do CCSDS and LunaNet support space communications interoperability?
CCSDS defines common protocols for telemetry, command, and networking, while LunaNet provides an architectural blueprint for service discovery and delay-tolerant links across partner networks. Together they reduce custom interface work and allow multi-agency missions to coordinate using standardized networking and security profiles.
What role does SWIM play in air traffic data integration?
SWIM harmonizes aeronautical information, weather, and flow data through standardized services so stakeholders can access consistent, high-quality information. This enables UTM-ATM interoperability and supports modern API strategies, reducing format conversions and proprietary gateways across borders and systems.
Why is MOSA crucial for defense avionics procurement?
MOSA mandates interface-based designs and promotes conformance certification, allowing buyers to procure interoperable modules instead of closed systems. It speeds upgrades, lowers integration risk, and ensures data rights and open interfaces are defined early, improving lifecycle cost control.
What will determine how fast interoperable systems roll out fleet-wide?
Certification artifacts, test vectors, and reference implementations will be key, alongside regulator acceptance of change management frameworks. Operators will look for measurable integration savings and robust assurance in safety-critical domains before scaling deployments.